AI Moderation Tools

Interactive matcher

Moderation Stack Matcher

Specify your content types, the harm classes you need to cover, your volume tier, latency budget, deployment constraints and budget sensitivity — and get a ranked shortlist of moderation tools and stacks, each with a harm-class coverage heatmap, a rough cost-per-million estimate, a false-positive note and a link to our sourced review.

Hard constraints (modality, deployment, latency) filter the candidate set; remaining tools are ranked by a weighted harm-class coverage score against your budget. Everything runs in your browser and your spec is encoded in the URL. Coverage and cost figures are read from vendor documentation and published evaluations, and are summarised in our tool reviews (last reviewed 2026-05).

What content types do you moderate?

A tool must cover every modality you check, or it is filtered out.

Which harm classes must you cover?

Weighted into the coverage score; tools with a hard zero on a required class are penalized heavily.

Volume tier (items per month)

Scales the cost estimate; very high volume favors cheap self-hosted options.

Latency budget

Sync inline moderation needs sub-300ms tools; async tolerates heavier models.

Deployment constraint

A hard filter — air-gapped excludes every hosted API.

Budget sensitivity

Weights cost-per-million in the final ranking.

All 12 tools & stacks we score

Coverage is graded per harm class: 2 = strong, 1 = partial, 0 = none. Cost-per-million is a rough order-of-magnitude estimate (USD), not a quote.

Related tools in this network

Other interactive tools across the network that pair well with this one.